On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:07 AM, ChrisT <ccthiel@gmail.com> wrote:
Rails 3.0.0.beta
And as far as loading rails, I mean anything involving the 'rails'
command. rails console, rails server, rails generate - all 30+
seconds.
Anything involve the rake tasks rails ships with: rake db:migrate,
rake test:units - 30+ seconds.
I honestly haven't even gotten into actually running the server yet -
I've been writing models and test units, but I did test on just
webrick and response time - 30+ seconds.
This is on Windows XP, Ubuntu 9.10 or Ubuntu 9.04 (both ubuntu were on
VirtualBox with XP as the host). I've tried Ruby 1.9.1 and 1.8.7.
1.8.7 just made things vastly worse - 2+ minutes to start some things.
Chris, these thing load for me in less than 5 seconds for Mac OS 10.6.2 and Ubuntu 9.10.
Windows 7 Ultimate can get things loaded in less than 20 seconds. BTW, I have the following
system configuration:
Mac Pro:
Mac OS 10.6.2
8-core 2.93 GHz
32 GB RAM
VMWare Fusion 3 - Windows 7 Ultimate (64 bit) and Ubuntu 9.10 (64 bit)
Also, I have scaled things all the way down using 1 and 2 cores and I was able to get the
same results. Again, Rails 3 is currently in Beta. Thus, all the needed optimizations are
not in place and I'm quite sure that there's a level of debugging logic within the code base.
This debugging logic will most likely be removed and optimizations will be put into place
for the first release candidate (RC).
Good luck,
-Conrad
On Mar 18, 1:19 pm, Conrad Taylor <conra...@gmail.com> wrote:> <sinsil...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Andrius Chamentauskas
>> > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<rubyonrails-talk%2Bunsubscrib e@googlegroups.com>
> > Hello all,
>
> > I've recently started a project and I wanted to give ruby 1.9 + rails
> > a chance. Well everything works great, so far haven't encountered any
> > gem that didn't work (so anyone out there you should give it a try).
> > There's only one minor glitch: on ruby 1.8.7 loading rails environment
> > takes 1-2 secs, on 1.9.1 it takes ~10 secs. Maybe anyone had similar
> > problem? I'm on ubuntu 9.10 and I compiled ruby from source (as I've
> > noticed it works ~20% faster than apt version).
>
> What do you mean when you say loading Rails? Command-line using webrick or
> thin? Rails console? Passenger? Also, what version of Rails are you
> using?
>
> -Conrad
>
>
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > .--
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
No comments:
Post a Comment