rubyonrailsin

A Ruby and Rails talk

Thursday, March 11, 2010


[Radiant-Dev] Re: Solving the Radiant theme and template problem

by rubyonrailsin 0 comments

Tag


Share this post:
Design Float
StumbleUpon
Reddit

Great, awsome you guys rock! So nice to see the enthousiasm, and Im
not the only one who love to see this added.

A .yml file with theme details, url, author, licensetype would be a
good start I guess?. I guess an example theme based on best practices
with some usefull snippets and layouts would help a lot of users
begining
and make Radiant far more adoptable. Im currently working on a
flexible way arrange my snippets its fairly easy the xml markup rocks,
so I can hopefully migrate fast from wordpress to radiant with a total
12 sites of some customers.
Doing such thing by copying snippets to the database would amost be
undoable in terms of maintainance and flexibility.


On Mar 11, 3:45 pm, "M. Scott Ford" <sc...@vaderpi.com> wrote:
> I am not sure that we need a standard for all of those items.
>
> I was leaning more towards a way to define the assumptions that the theme makes about the existence of such items. (Determining this without an explicit declaration would be even better.) Then when a theme is selected by a user, have the extension create any items that are required but missing, and then warning the user if existing assets are not going to be utilized. The warnings are probably best communicated by copy just above the editor for each affected item as well as a different icon in the list.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "John Long" <johnwlong2...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 9:35am
> To: radiantcms-dev@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Radiant-Dev] Solving the Radiant theme and template problem
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:08 AM, rubybox <voorr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > So what Im interested in is any experienced developer interested in
> > this? Am I the only one so frustrated by this, or can we get together and
> > create a working extension for this?
>
> I talked to Chris Rankin yesterday about his Site Theme yesterday
> discussed some modifications to his extension that would make it more
> flexible in the way that you describe.
>
> http://ext.radiantcms.org/extensions/207-site-theme
>
> To me there are two major areas of improvement needed:
>
> 1. Making destruction of layouts, pages, and snippets optional
>
> 2. Creating a standard template specification that templates can
> conform to (or not) at the author's discretion
>
> The idea behind a standard template specification is that the names of
> pages, page parts, snippets, and layouts should be consistent across
> most templates. This would allow a high degree of reusability and make
> theming much more flexible.
>
> Chris was excited about both ideas but could probably use some help
> with the implementation. Also I think it would be good to get a
> consensus from the community on what the standard template
> specification should be.
>
> --
> John Longhttp://wiseheartdesign.comhttp://recursivecreative.com
>
> --
> Radiant CMS Dev Mailing List
> Post:        radiantcms-dev@googlegroups.com
> Unsubscribe: radiantcms-dev-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> Group Site:  http://groups.google.com/group/radiantcms-dev/

--
Radiant CMS Dev Mailing List
Post: radiantcms-dev@googlegroups.com
Unsubscribe: radiantcms-dev-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
Group Site: http://groups.google.com/group/radiantcms-dev/

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe feeds via e-mail

Blog Archive